Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-483TABVBKH939V3Q · v1 · 2026-01-08

Operational Influence Proxies in a TFIM Surrogate: Non-Monotonicity and a Controlled ω = 0 Witness Floor Mechanism

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We study spatial influence detection in a transverse-field Ising chain (TFIM) subjected to localized Markovian noise. Using an operational one-site trace-distance influence proxy computed from TEBD combined with Monte Carlo wavefunction (MCWF) sampling, we test whether remote dissipation produces an identifiable nonzero asymptotic influence offset (a "floor") as a function of separation epsilon. Uncertainties are estimated by trajectory bootstrap and model selection is performed between exponential decay and exponential-plus-offset forms using both BIC and the finite-sample corrected criterion AICc. In the TFIM surrogate regimes explored, we find no robustly identifiable floor for both dephasing and amplitude-damping channels; instead, the influence proxy is non-monotone in separation, consistent with coherent finite-size structure superimposed on average attenuation. To demonstrate that floors can exist as a controlled mechanism independent of fragile spatial fits, we present a Davies/witness stress test: for nonzero zero-frequency bath weight gamma(0) > 0, a commutator witness yields a strictly positive lower bound on an effective decay envelope. Exact-diagonalization calculations show this lower bound is robust to enlarging the observable support and to variations in inverse temperature. v2 adds: a synthetic-injection power analysis showing that over the sampled one-octave window epsilon in [16,32] with n = 5 points, a constant floor is nearly degenerate with a slow exponential -- AICc essentially never detects a floor and even BIC requires D0 ~ 30 sigma -- so "no identifiable floor" is in part a design limitation, now stated as such; a fully declared exact-diagonalization benchmark for the witness (v1 did not record its ED parameters), regenerable from scratch by the shipped suite; a null case showing the witness switches off (kappa_min ~ 1e-29) for couplings with vanishing omega = 0 component; an invariant-subspace caveat for the envelope interpretation; and series cross-references.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.