Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-483TABVBKH939V3Q · v1 · 2026-01-08

Operational Influence Proxies in a TFIM Surrogate: Non-Monotonicity and a Controlled ω = 0 Witness Floor Mechanism

Lluis Eriksson

Earlier deposit preserved without the current AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record

Abstract

We study spatial influence detection in a transverse-field Ising chain (TFIM) subjected to localized Markovian noise. Using an operational one-site trace-distance influence proxy computed from TEBD combined with Monte Carlo wavefunction (MCWF) sampling, we test whether remote dissipation produces an identifiable nonzero asymptotic influence offset (a "floor") as a function of separation epsilon. Uncertainties are estimated by trajectory bootstrap and model selection is performed between exponential decay and exponential-plus-offset forms using both BIC and the finite-sample corrected criterion AICc. In the TFIM surrogate regimes explored, we find no robustly identifiable floor for both dephasing and amplitude-damping channels; instead, the influence proxy is non-monotone in separation, consistent with coherent finite-size structure superimposed on average attenuation. To demonstrate that floors can exist as a controlled mechanism independent of fragile spatial fits, we present a Davies/witness stress test: for nonzero zero-frequency bath weight gamma(0) > 0, a commutator witness yields a strictly positive lower bound on an effective decay envelope. Exact-diagonalization calculations show this lower bound is robust to enlarging the observable support and to variations in inverse temperature. v2 adds: a synthetic-injection power analysis showing that over the sampled one-octave window epsilon in [16,32] with n = 5 points, a constant floor is nearly degenerate with a slow exponential -- AICc essentially never detects a floor and even BIC requires D0 ~ 30 sigma -- so "no identifiable floor" is in part a design limitation, now stated as such; a fully declared exact-diagonalization benchmark for the witness (v1 did not record its ED parameters), regenerable from scratch by the shipped suite; a null case showing the witness switches off (kappa_min ~ 1e-29) for couplings with vanishing omega = 0 component; an invariant-subspace caveat for the envelope interpretation; and series cross-references.

Preview PDF on this page v1

Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.

Reference this work

Cite this paper

v1 · 2026-01-08

Lluis Eriksson (2026). Operational Influence Proxies in a TFIM Surrogate: Non-Monotonicity and a Controlled ω = 0 Witness Floor Mechanism. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2026-483TABVBKH939V3Q, v1. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2026-483TABVBKH939V3Q/versions/v1/ Archived manuscript; ARR-2026-483TABVBKH939V3Q v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.

Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.

Version history

The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; AIRR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. AIRR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Model assessments and review context

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No supported exact-version report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. AIRR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.

    Record timestamps & download statistics
    Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
    Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized AIRR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
    Mirrored PDF downloadsNot availableBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in AIRR's per-record download snapshot.
    Page viewsNot availablePage-view counts are not available in this public snapshot. Optional operator statistics are separate.
    Definitions and rankings →