Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-34XCH3HCWK9ENB44 · v1 · 2026-01-10

From Static Recoverability to Maintenance Power: A Typed Pipeline with ω = 0 Obstructions

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We study when geometric separation in gapped quantum systems yields a genuine reduction in thermodynamic resources required to maintain coherence against uncontrolled open-system dynamics. Our analysis separates three layers. First, in a regularized Gaussian split regime motivated by algebraic QFT, we state an explicit static reconstruction bound: collar suppression of vacuum cross-correlations enables approximate state recovery via a conditional-reattachment covariance rule with fidelity error controlled by a cross-block recovery norm. Second, we show why static recoverability does not automatically imply suppression of dynamical decay rates: fixed-point structure and Bohr-zero (omega = 0) channels can generate obstructions invisible to static clustering alone. We formalize this using an exact omega = 0 Dirichlet identity and implement finite-size commutator-witness diagnostics in the transverse-field Ising chain, finding no evidence of a size-independent omega = 0 floor in that benchmark regime for tested sizes. Third, we give an autocontained finite-dimensional core linking coherence loss to incremental maintenance power under an explicit battery-assisted thermal-operations model with paired strategies, and we state a typed rate-inheritance hypothesis identifying precisely what additional dynamical input is required to propagate collar suppression into power suppression. We conclude with a Type III blueprint. v2 corrects two points and adds verification: (i) the recovery rule of the static layer is conditional reattachment -- not the Petz map for correlated Gaussian references (aligned with 2601.0007 v2 and 2512.0060 v2), with an explicit admissibility hypothesis; (ii) the v1 work-cost bookkeeping (its Eq. (25)) carried a sign error -- the work cost is the battery free-energy decrease -- which made v1's one-step work lemma false as printed (random energy-conserving unitaries violate it in 57/100 draws) while its own proof chain and everything downstream hold verbatim with the corrected sign; this is the same error class repaired in 2512.0061 v2. v2 further adds a GNS/KMS convention bridge to the companion witness papers, series positioning, an updated status of the rate-inheritance hypothesis, and a verification suite.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.