Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-7RASMSMHWW8PM9S8 · v1 · 2026-01-11

A Non-Gaussian Clustering-Recovery Bridge via Conditional Mutual Information: Interacting Gibbs States, Explicit Petz Benchmarks, and a Conditional Link to Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We present a quantitative clustering-recovery bridge for interacting quantum many-body systems that is intrinsically non-Gaussian, organized around conditional mutual information (CMI). For a geometric tripartition A-B-C in which B is a collar of width w separating A from C, an exponential geometric Markov bound I(A:C|B) <= K e^(-alpha w) implies exponentially accurate recovery of rho_ABC from rho_AB in the theorem-facing metric -log F, by combining the Fawzi-Renner inequality with an elementary conversion to fidelity error bounds. We obtain a proved interacting lane (shielded small-region geometry, arbitrary temperature) by invoking recent local Markovness results for finite-range lattice Gibbs states. Numerically, we benchmark the mechanism in the transverse-field Ising chain with longitudinal field, comparing integrable (hz = 0) and non-integrable (hz = 0.5) regimes, and evaluate the explicit Petz recovery map with a censored log-plotting and fit protocol. v2 corrects the Fawzi-Renner factor under the squared-fidelity convention used throughout (-log F <= I, not I/2; fourth occurrence of this correction in the series), with a substantive empirical consequence: v1's headline "mild overshoot" of Petz over the FR scale (r of about 1.23-1.26 in the non-integrable, low-temperature, minimal-collar regime, including rotated and twirled controls) was measured against the incorrect half scale; against the corrected scale the overshoot disappears entirely (r of about 0.62), and the v1 conclusion of "a genuine gap between explicit Petz-type constructions and the existential optimal-recovery scale" is withdrawn. The corrected conclusion is stronger: explicit Petz satisfies the FR scale throughout the dataset, with at least about 40 percent margin even at the hardest point. A fully regenerable verification suite reproduces the pipeline from scratch. Finally, we state a conditional application to entanglement wedge reconstruction, separating proved information-theoretic content from bulk-boundary interface assumptions.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.