Bayesian Matroid-Union Bounds for Quantum List Discrimination: Support Congestion, Process Compression, and Exact Adaptive-Parallel Phases
In quantum list discrimination a measurement returns at most ell candidate labels and succeeds when the true hypothesis belongs to the returned list. We associate a Rado independent-transversal matroid to the support subspaces of a mixed quantum ensemble and prove that every true-label inclusion vector lies in the independence polytope of the ell-fold matroid union. This yields all-subset Bayesian bounds for arbitrary priors, soft rewards, an integer congestion deficit, equality audits, and canonical compression to quantum-process testers. Exact attainment and insufficiency examples separate support combinatorics from quantum geometry. We then solve two input-dependent process families. For binary laminar dephase-prepare channels with M=2^h, list size ell=2^s, and q uses, arbitrary entangled parallel probes and adaptive quantum memories obey P_parallel=min(1,ell(q+1)/M) and P_adaptive=min(1,ell 2^q/M). For complete unitary-error ensembles we translate the known approximate dense-coding spectrum law into a list cap, derive an exact serial/parallel/Bell multitime trichotomy, and give a fixed-probe example where the coarse list-rank cap is not attained. The matroid theorem is a support obstruction rather than a general POVM feasibility characterization; the laminar separation is a classical feedback tradeoff embedded quantumly, and no indefinite-causal-order advantage is claimed.
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Partial
- Reproducibility
- Partial
- Lean 4
- Not applicable
Recorded under ARR-VERIFY-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.
Version history
The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
- v1 · source snapshot available · viewing
AI assistance statement
OpenAI Codex assisted with theorem exploration, literature triage, proof stress testing, exact verifier development, manuscript editing, reproducibility checks, machine-readable extraction, and ARR deposit preparation. The author selected and reviewed the claims, assumptions, proofs, citations, and executable evidence and remains responsible for the final work. AI output is not treated as independent scientific evidence.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Independent model assessments
No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Founder-owned pilot record: Lluis Eriksson is both the author and ARR's current founder-editor. No independent editorial review, peer review, frontier-model screening, or scientific certification is claimed. Acceptance records a technically valid deposit, not a finding that the paper is correct.