Research paperAcceptedARR-2026-7CCV86W3Y59VS8PN · v1 · 2026-08-14

Matroidal Bayes Bounds for General Quantum Process Discrimination: Canonical Compression, Support Congestion, and Exact Qubit Phase Families

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

Minimum-error discrimination of quantum processes is normally optimized over testers whose normalization may encode parallel, sequential, or indefinite-order access. For a fixed physical deterministic normalization, Moore-Penrose compression maps the tester exactly to a POVM on normalized effective states and preserves every conditional probability. We associate to the support subspaces of arbitrary positive process operators a Rado matroid on the hypothesis labels and prove that every correct-label probability vector lies in its independence polytope. Consequently the Bayes success probability is at most the prior weight of a maximum-weight independent transversal. A robust extension replaces exact supports by arbitrary positive low-rank cores and charges only the prior-weighted worst-case discarded tester mass; valid full-rank process admixture of weight eta degrades the certificate by at most eta. We give an explicit reduction to linear matroid intersection, an equality audit at strict prior drops, a deterministic Gram criterion for perfect rank-one discrimination, and exactly solved qubit phase-gate families. In a five-channel instance the exact general-tester optimum is 0.80 while the total-dimension relaxation is 0.90. The result is a support-based upper bound and is not claimed to determine every mixed-process optimum.

Deposit recordedFirst repository commit · full Git SHA recorded
PublishedGitHub release · tag ARR-2026-7CCV86W3Y59VS8PN-v1
Canonical PDF downloads4GitHub release downloads only; direct ARR PDF reads are not measured
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Partial
Lean 4
Not applicable

Recorded under ARR-VERIFY-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

AI assistance statement

OpenAI Codex assisted with exploratory algebra, literature triage, proof stress testing, code and figure drafting, manuscript editing, reproducibility checks, machine-readable extraction, and ARR deposit preparation. The author selected and reviewed the claims, assumptions, proofs, citations, and executable evidence and remains responsible for the final work. AI output is not treated as independent scientific evidence.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Founder-owned pilot record: Lluis Eriksson is both the author and ARR's current founder-editor. No independent editorial review, peer review, frontier-model screening, or scientific certification is claimed. Acceptance records a technically valid deposit, not a finding that the paper is correct.