Combinatorics

2 records · Newest first · Historical imports are labelled separately.

Search within this subject →
Research paperAcceptedARR-2026-15SJ1ANHDN8D88Z1 · v1

Bayesian Matroid-Union Bounds for Quantum List Discrimination: Support Congestion, Process Compression, and Exact Adaptive-Parallel Phases

Lluis Eriksson

In quantum list discrimination a measurement returns at most ell candidate labels and succeeds when the true hypothesis belongs to the returned list. We associate a Rado independent-transversal matroid to the support subspaces of a mixed quantum ensemble and prove that every true-label inclusion vector lies in the independence polytope of the ell-fold matroid union. This yields all-subset Bayesian bounds for arbitrary priors, soft rewards, an integer congestion deficit, equality audits, and canonical compression to quantum-process testers. Exact attainment and insufficiency examples separate support combinatorics from quantum geometry. We then solve two input-dependent process families. For binary laminar dephase-prepare channels with M=2^h, list size ell=2^s, and q uses, arbitrary entangled parallel probes and adaptive quantum memories obey P_parallel=min(1,ell(q+1)/M) and P_adaptive=min(1,ell 2^q/M). For complete unitary-error ensembles we translate the known approximate dense-coding spectrum law into a list cap, derive an exact serial/parallel/Bell multitime trichotomy, and give a fixed-probe example where the coarse list-rank cap is not attained. The matroid theorem is a support obstruction rather than a general POVM feasibility characterization; the laminar separation is a classical feedback tradeoff embedded quantumly, and no indefinite-causal-order advantage is claimed.

Published Cite this version
Research paperAcceptedARR-2026-7CCV86W3Y59VS8PN · v1

Matroidal Bayes Bounds for General Quantum Process Discrimination: Canonical Compression, Support Congestion, and Exact Qubit Phase Families

Lluis Eriksson

Minimum-error discrimination of quantum processes is normally optimized over testers whose normalization may encode parallel, sequential, or indefinite-order access. For a fixed physical deterministic normalization, Moore-Penrose compression maps the tester exactly to a POVM on normalized effective states and preserves every conditional probability. We associate to the support subspaces of arbitrary positive process operators a Rado matroid on the hypothesis labels and prove that every correct-label probability vector lies in its independence polytope. Consequently the Bayes success probability is at most the prior weight of a maximum-weight independent transversal. A robust extension replaces exact supports by arbitrary positive low-rank cores and charges only the prior-weighted worst-case discarded tester mass; valid full-rank process admixture of weight eta degrades the certificate by at most eta. We give an explicit reduction to linear matroid intersection, an equality audit at strict prior drops, a deterministic Gram criterion for perfect rank-one discrimination, and exactly solved qubit phase-gate families. In a five-channel instance the exact general-tester optimum is 0.80 while the total-dimension relaxation is 0.90. The result is a support-based upper bound and is not claimed to determine every mixed-process optimum.

Published Cite this version