Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-7B37HVCEAD9A1BWQ · v1 · 2026-01-13

Recoverability Geometry: Distances and Embeddings from Quantum Markov Data — Definitions, Diagnostics, and a Reconstruction Protocol

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We propose an operational route from recoverability data to effective geometry. Given a tripartition A-B(w)-C and a collar width w, we consider a Petz-type recoverability error E_rec(w) defined via fidelity and extracted from a fixed collaring rule (A, C, w) -> B(w). We define distance-like functionals from the minimal buffer needed to suppress E_rec(w) below a threshold, and from exponential fit scales when such a regime exists; these are organized into a (generally non-metric) dissimilarity matrix on coarse regions, symmetrized when needed, and embedded via multidimensional scaling or diffusion maps. The paper emphasizes precise definitions (collaring rule, symmetrization, censoring below numerical floors) and falsifiable diagnostics (approximate triangle inequalities, robustness to thresholds and regularization). A minimal control experiment in the 1D transverse-field Ising model illustrates the pipeline and the growth of a recoverability length near criticality. v2 (definitions unchanged) adds: a regenerable suite replacing the "representative run" of v1 -- the control table is regenerated from scratch, its g = 0.5 row is flagged as unstable by the paper's own fit-window policy, and a three-point-fit caveat is stated; the first in-model test of the tracking conjecture -- from the same ground states, xi_rec/xi_corr in {0.98, 0.53, 0.52} across regimes, same order of magnitude throughout; a first numerical illustration of the embedding machinery (four coarse regions, MDS recovering the chain order exactly, triangle violations bounded by discretization), which also surfaces an operational lesson: tracing out the region between B(w) and C fakes separation and inverts monotonicity, so the separation condition of the collaring rule is essential, and profiles below the separating width are not admissible; the observation that the fixed-|A|,|C|/traced-environment design of the control is precisely the fixed-target protocol that resolves the |C|-shrinkage confound identified in the companion d_eff notes; and series positioning.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.