Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-4P264G2DC08DTTKP · v1 · 2026-01-13

Recoverability Length Scales and Wilson Loops in Lattice Gauge Theories: Protocol, Definitions, and Conjectural Links to Confinement Diagnostics

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We propose a numerical protocol and falsifiable conjectures relating quantum-information recoverability measures to confinement diagnostics in lattice gauge theories. For a tripartition A-B-C and collar width w, we define a Petz-type recovery error E_rec(w) and extract a recoverability length from threshold and fit criteria. Since gauge constraints obstruct naive factorization, the protocol is formulated in an extended-Hilbert-space (EHS) prescription by default, with an algebraic (gauge-invariant) variant outlined together with its subtleties (centers, sectors). We conjecture that E_rec(w) decays exponentially in gapped phases and that its scale tracks confinement scales set by Wilson loops. v2 executes the testbed that v1 only specified: on a Z2 ladder of four plaquettes (14 links, Gauss law enforced exactly, = 1 to 1e-6), the suite computes E_rec(w) and Wilson decay on the same ground states across five couplings. Findings: the pipeline runs end to end; xi_rec is identifiable at three of five couplings and nearly coupling-independent (0.21-0.31, spread x1.4), while the Wilson decay length varies strongly (0.38-6.9, spread x8.6): no tracking at ladder level. Because height-one ladders degenerate area and perimeter, the Wilson scale there is not a pure confinement scale, so this first dataset is inconclusive-but-cautionary for the tracking conjecture rather than a falsification -- and it sharpens the requirement: a genuine 2D lattice is needed. v2 further flags the TFIM control row shared with the companion framework note as unstable under regeneration, and adds series positioning. No v1 definition is changed.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.