Research paperWorking paperARR-2026-71PQXGYGR887JAWR · v3 · 2026-10-26

Sharp entropy-budget laws for Gaussian reset channels

Lluis Eriksson

Citable version that has not completed AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record

Abstract

We determine complete high-energy entropy-budget minimax loss curves for unassisted classical communication through Gaussian reset channels, allowing entangled block encoding and collective decoding without preshared entanglement. Relative to the signal classical-capacity benchmark, the sharp regime is vacuum noise t=o(E), including attenuation, amplification and additive noise with an eventual positive noise floor. A bounded-gain unknown fixed family has the same law with one common encoder and decoder, including cold and noiseless members. The block converse uses causal quantum references, a summed minimum-output-entropy floor and averaged Choi-order deficits; physical exact types transfer the rate to arbitrary fixed reset energy. A strict flag-loss gap proves necessity for the complete curves. The assisted thermal law is retained. Coding limits precede energy limits; critical curves and efficient blocklength remain open. Exact20-page PDF review664, continuing full review659, recommends accept scientifically, importance5.5/10 and technical8.5/10, with no material objections found. Shared context and unverified independence are declared; this is not editorial acceptance.

Preview PDF on this page v3

Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.

Reference this work

Cite this paper

v3 · 2026-10-26

Lluis Eriksson (2026). Sharp entropy-budget laws for Gaussian reset channels. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2026-71PQXGYGR887JAWR, v3. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2026-71PQXGYGR887JAWR/versions/v3/ Research preprint; ARR-2026-71PQXGYGR887JAWR v3. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Working paper; not admitted to the AIRR accepted collection.

Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.

Version history

The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v3 · major revision · source snapshot available · viewing
  • v2 · major revision · source snapshot available
  • v1 · source snapshot available

Revision statement

Major revision. Removes preshared entanglement via arbitrary-block converse and extends sharp entropy-budget laws to bounded-gain covariant Gaussian families; explicit compound deficits and contextual citations.

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Partial
Reproducibility
Partial
Lean 4
Not applicable

Recorded under ARR-VERIFY-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.

AI assistance statement

Author-directed substantial OpenAI Codex assistance in derivation, writing and numerics is declared in Appendix A. Full requested Astra xhigh review659 examined the previous19-page PDF; same-reviewer correction check664 read this exact20-page PDF, resolved P1-P4 and reaffirmed importance5.5/10, technical8.5/10 and accept as a scientific recommendation. The complete originals are retained. This is one review continued across an actual revision, not two independent votes or automatic score transfer. Shared context/filesystem, prior participation, selected primary-source reading and incidental qualitative-summary exposure are declared. Runtime model identity, effort, isolation and independence are not externally attested. Six supplied programs were replayed in659 and twelve unchanged program/output hashes verified in664; no independent implementation or formal verification. Baitenov full text was not obtained. The PDF freeze-time assessment-pending statements predate these completed reports; external metadata supplies the subsequent chronology without altering reviewed bytes. Author/operator conflict is disclosed. No native gate completion, independent human review, editorial admission or worldwide priority is claimed.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Model assessments and review context

    Read the scale and limits
    5.50 / 10.00Excellent
    Distinct models
    1
    Range
    5.50–5.50
    Method
    bounded capability-weighted mean · exact version only

    Limited evidence · 0/1 benchmark matches. This is an evidence description, not a probability of correctness.

    Only one distinct model; One provider; shared blind spots possible; Fresh blinded review context not documented for every model; Mathematical benchmark not applied to this subject

    Score calculation and evidence

    Unweighted mean: 5.50. Policy: AIRR-RATING-1.0. Method and limits.

    ModelOriginal scoreWeightBasis
    OpenAI · gpt-6-astra5.501.000Benchmark outside declared mathematical scope

    Download the calculation snapshot

    Review input clarification

    Exact20-page v3 was actually read in correction check664, continuing the same full-review659 of the previous19-page PDF. P1-P4 are resolved; accept is the reviewer recommendation, not AIRR admission. Importance5.5/10 and technical8.5/10 were reaffirmed after actual new-PDF examination. Six overall stars are the mandated half-up rendering of5.5, not a score of6.0. Binding671 only serializes that judgment, without another vote or reassessment. All original659/664 reports and the context remain available. Shared context/filesystem, reviewer participation and unverified runtime identity/effort/isolation/independence are declared. The manuscript freeze-time assessment-pending language predates these reports; reviewed bytes are unchanged. The author/operator authorized exact linked revision3 as a Working paper; native founder gate completion and independent human approval are not claimed. v1/v2 and their own scores remain immutable.

    Operator record · · Source files and affected reports

    OpenAI · gpt-6-astra · unknown · review context: shared5.50

    Recommendation: Accept · Material objections: 0

    Post hoc schema binding of review 664, a continuation by the same reviewer of full review 659, not a new independent vote, review or regrading. The exact 20-page PDF was read in 664; P1-P4 were resolved and no unintended mathematical changes or unresolved material objections were found. Recommendation changed from minor to accept for those verified corrections. Exact AIRR importance remains 5.5/10; overall_stars=6 is only its mandated half-up whole-star rendering. Separate technical quality remains 8.5/10. The requested model was gpt-6-astra with xhigh effort; effective identity, effort and runtime isolation are not externally attested. Context and filesystem were shared. The assessed_at value is the original 664 timestamp; ARR-ASSESS-1.0 identifies this later formatting, not the original assessment prompt. This is a scientific recommendation, not a native intake gate, editorial admission, human peer review, publication authorization or correctness certificate.

    Correctness confidence
    New complete PDF and definitions checked; no invalidating defect found. Imported proof audit and formal certification remain limited.
    Rigor
    Definitions and attribution clearer; substantive proof unchanged, with existing operational and uniformity safeguards retained.
    Novelty
    New citations clarify attribution without changing contribution. No exhaustive search or worldwide priority certificate.
    Significance
    Specialized contribution and substantive scope unchanged; no new result from editorial corrections.
    Reproducibility
    All 12 diagnostic files identical to own successful previous runs; no new or independent implementation claimed.

    Strengths

    • Averaged unassisted converse handles arbitrary entangled block inputs, shared total energy and blocklength-uniform errors.
    • Normalized-state TRE, mixed quantum references, the summed entropy floor and physical exact types address the principal proof risks examined in 659.
    • The exact revised PDF resolves P1-P4 through explicit family deficits, direct antecedent citations, version precision and a preserved disclosure appendix.
    • Six supplied diagnostic programs were successfully reproduced in 659; all six programs and six expected outputs were confirmed byte-identical in 664.

    Weaknesses

    • Specialized asymptotic scope: the actual critical loss curve and efficient uniform blocklength bounds remain open; the isolated additive-noise result retains a positive eventual noise floor.
    • No complete independent rederivation of every foundational dependency, formal proof verification, independent diagnostic implementation or operational encoder/decoder implementation.
    • Literature examination was directed and nonexhaustive; Baitenov was checked through primary abstract/metadata only, so worldwide priority and detailed full-text overlap are not certified.
    • Shared context, prior reviewer participation and filesystem exposure limit independence; effective model identity, reasoning effort and runtime isolation are not externally attested.
    • No fresh execution of unchanged diagnostics was claimed in 664, and this later binding performs no scientific rerun or reassessment.

    Potential errors

    None reported.

    Strong novelty candidates

    • Averaged arbitrary-block unassisted converse with entangled inputs and shared energy
    • Uniform entropy-budget minimax law under sublinear Gaussian vacuum noise, including bounded/cold baths
    • Strict full-curve necessity and phase-insensitive amplification/additive/unknown-family extension under stated floors

    Unresolved material objections

    None reported.

    arr:assessment:a2ddeda3-6a4f-4cf6-9c08-d4c580a942b9 · prompt ARR-ASSESS-1.0 · response SHA-256 27ba83df8fa83eadf24655d212335ecb8ebf746ecd3175d69b36b7daf12da861 · canonical PDF SHA-256 6968375b22facb1a5467606b16df7a6ccabe0bac0dee4824afc0c4fb932c4662

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized Working-paper v3 with exact-PDF review664 and preserved full659 history. Native frontier gate and independent human decision not completed; public v1/v2 remain immutable.

    Record timestamps & download statistics
    Deposit recordedFirst repository commit · full Git SHA recorded
    PublishedGitHub release · tag ARR-2026-71PQXGYGR887JAWR-v3
    Canonical PDF downloads6GitHub release downloads only; direct AIRR PDF reads are not included
    Page viewsNot availablePage-view counts are not available in this public snapshot. Optional operator statistics are separate.
    Definitions and rankings →