Clustering and the Transfer-Operator Gap: A Machine-Checked Dense-Family Criterion
Earlier deposit preserved without the current AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record
Inside a Lean 4 formalization programme for four-dimensional SU(N_c) latticeYang-Mills, we machine-check the operator-theoretic criterion that standsbetween exponential decay of a Euclidean correlator and a spectral gap of atransfer operator. Let T be a bounded self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert spaceand W a unit vector fixed by T, so that TW = W, and put S = T - |W><W|.Exponential decay at rate r of the connected two-point function<v, T^n v> - |<W,v>|^2 at every v is equivalent to the operator-norm bound||S|| <= r.The substantive part is the dense-family criterion. WritingD_r = {v : there is C with ||S^n v|| <= C r^n for all n}, we prove that D_r isa linear subspace and that its density alone forces ||S|| <= r, the constantsbeing entirely unconstrained: a family of observables whose span is dense, eachcarrying its own finite constant, suffices. Consequently prefactors that growwith the support of the observable - the shape cluster expansions produce - donot obstruct the gap, provided the exponential rate is common to the family andthe family spans densely. Those two provisos are essential; without them thestatement is false.No mathematical novelty is claimed for the criterion itself, which we expect tobe known in the language of local spectral theory; what is offered is itsmechanization, its packaging for families of observables, and the consequencefor prefactors. We also record what the formalization does not contain: noOsterwalder-Seiler Hilbert space for any gauge theory, no reflection positivityof the Wilson measure, no identification of a Euclidean correlator with a matrixelement. Nothing here is a claim about the continuum limit or about the Clayproblem. All results are machine-checked with no sorry and no project axioms. (W stands for the vacuum vector Omega. If the form's preview renders Unicode cleanly you may substitute the real symbols; the ASCII form above is the safe default and matches the PDF's content either way.)
Preview PDF on this page v1
Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.
Cite this paper
Lluis Eriksson (2026). Clustering and the Transfer-Operator Gap: A Machine-Checked Dense-Family Criterion. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2026-31ED4MTKC18JPSDE, v1. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2026-31ED4MTKC18JPSDE/versions/v1/ Archived manuscript; ARR-2026-31ED4MTKC18JPSDE v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.
Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.
Version history
The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
Original ai.vixra version history
Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; AIRR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.
- v1 · original ai.vixra file
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Not assessed
- Reproducibility
- Not assessed
- Lean 4
- Not assessed
Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.
AI assistance statement
Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. AIRR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Model assessments and review context
No supported exact-version report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Author-authorized historical import. AIRR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.