[
  {
    "id": "ARR-2026-31ED4MTKC18JPSDE-v1",
    "type": "article",
    "title": "Clustering and the Transfer-Operator Gap: A Machine-Checked Dense-Family Criterion",
    "author": [
      {
        "literal": "Lluis Eriksson"
      }
    ],
    "issued": {
      "date-parts": [
        [
          2026,
          7,
          27
        ]
      ]
    },
    "publisher": "AIRR.SCIENCE",
    "archive": "AIRR.SCIENCE",
    "archive_location": "ARR-2026-31ED4MTKC18JPSDE",
    "version": "v1",
    "genre": "Archived manuscript",
    "URL": "https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2026-31ED4MTKC18JPSDE/versions/v1/",
    "note": "Archived manuscript; ARR-2026-31ED4MTKC18JPSDE v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.",
    "abstract": "Inside a Lean 4 formalization programme for four-dimensional SU(N_c) latticeYang-Mills, we machine-check the operator-theoretic criterion that standsbetween exponential decay of a Euclidean correlator and a spectral gap of atransfer operator. Let T be a bounded self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert spaceand W a unit vector fixed by T, so that TW = W, and put S = T - |W><W|.Exponential decay at rate r of the connected two-point function<v, T^n v> - |<W,v>|^2 at every v is equivalent to the operator-norm bound||S|| <= r.The substantive part is the dense-family criterion. WritingD_r = {v : there is C with ||S^n v|| <= C r^n for all n}, we prove that D_r isa linear subspace and that its density alone forces ||S|| <= r, the constantsbeing entirely unconstrained: a family of observables whose span is dense, eachcarrying its own finite constant, suffices. Consequently prefactors that growwith the support of the observable - the shape cluster expansions produce - donot obstruct the gap, provided the exponential rate is common to the family andthe family spans densely. Those two provisos are essential; without them thestatement is false.No mathematical novelty is claimed for the criterion itself, which we expect tobe known in the language of local spectral theory; what is offered is itsmechanization, its packaging for families of observables, and the consequencefor prefactors. We also record what the formalization does not contain: noOsterwalder-Seiler Hilbert space for any gauge theory, no reflection positivityof the Wilson measure, no identification of a Euclidean correlator with a matrixelement. Nothing here is a claim about the continuum limit or about the Clayproblem. All results are machine-checked with no sorry and no project axioms.  (W stands for the vacuum vector Omega. If the form's preview renders Unicode  cleanly you may substitute the real symbols; the ASCII form above is the safe  default and matches the PDF's content either way.)"
  }
]