Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-6XR3EE53GH8E49RH · v1 · 2026-01-14

Cmi-Based Recoverability Versus Wilson-Loop Diagnostics in Z2 Lattice Gauge Theory (2+1D): Exact Diagonalization Benchmark on Small Open Lattices

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We provide a finite-size benchmark testing whether a CMI-based recoverability proxy correlates with Wilson-loop confinement diagnostics in Z2 lattice gauge theory in 2+1 dimensions, computing ground states by sparse exact diagonalization on 2x2 and 2x3 open lattices (link qubits, Gauss-law penalty verified by ~ 1) and evaluating entropic quantities by pure-state Schmidt/SVD. We state a conditional bridge from a spatial area law to an operational "information horizon" via explicit hypotheses (H1)-(H4), with two recovery-length conventions (absolute, and normalized by the boundary prefactor Sigma_B(w) = |dB(w)| log 2). v2 (no v1 number is changed) adds a structural lemma that v1's own Table 1 was exhibiting unnoticed: for a pure global state, when the collar saturates (B = (A u C)^c) purity forces I(A:C|B) = I(A:C|empty) -- this is exactly why v1's Table 1 shows I(w=2) = I(w=0) = 0.4992999 to seven digits; the saturated row carries no buffer information, and the informative range of that benchmark is w in {0, 1}. v2 also anchors the non-monotonicity of CMI under collar enlargement as geometry-dependent (v1's wall geometry shows growth at w=0 to 1; a BFS-patch geometry on the same states decays monotonically -- there is no data-processing theorem in that direction); cross-links the CMI benchmark to the Petz-error twin on the same lattices (densified n = 8 sweep: Spearman rank-trend +1.00, permutation p = 1e-4, against both 1/sigma_eff and the inverse spectral gap -- so, as in the twin, confinement specificity is unresolved at these sizes); harmonizes the fidelity convention (v1 correctly uses root fidelity with I >= -2 log f, equivalent to the companions' squared-convention I >= -log F); removes an internal phase label leaked into v1's Section 1 title and a duplicated heading; and adds series positioning and a regenerable verification suite. The conditional proposition and its hypotheses are unchanged.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.