Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-5PXDYNR2ER89HTQG · v1 · 2026-07-09

Recurrence-Amos Proof of the Unit-Step Order-Monotonicity of (log I_nu)', with a Feynman-Hellmann Application to Two-Dimensional Lattice Gauge Theory

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

Let I_nu denote the modified Bessel function of the first kind and, forx>0, let rho_nu(x) = I_{nu+1}(x)/I_nu(x). We give a four-step, fullyelementary proof of the sharp difference inequality0 < rho_nu(x) - rho_{nu+1}(x) < 1/x (x>0, nu>=0), whose right-handinequality is exactly the strict increase of the logarithmic derivative(log I_nu)'(x) under the unit shift nu -> nu+1; consequentlynu -> (log I_nu)'(x) is strictly increasing along every unit-spaced gridnu_0 + N, in particular on the integer and half-integer orders arising inthe application. The stronger continuous-order statement is known(Freitas-Laugesen, arXiv:1810.07461, Lemma 10, via Bessel zeros); we makeno elementary claim about fractional steps. The proof given here uses noinformation about Bessel zeros: it combines the three-term recurrence withthe classical Amos-type upper bound rho_nu < x/(a+sqrt(a^2+x^2)),a = nu+1/2, and rests on the observation that this bound is exactlycalibrated for the problem: 1/U - U = 2a/x is an algebraic identity, and(2nu+1)/x is precisely the threshold the unit step requires; in fact theunit-step monotonicity and the Amos bound are equivalent. As anapplication we record the following consequence in two-dimensional latticegauge theory: for the Wilson action, every mass gap between charactersectors of the 2D transfer operator - for U(1) and SU(2) alike - is astrictly decreasing function of the bare coupling beta, by theFeynman-Hellmann identity. The algebraic core of the proof ismachine-checked in Lean 4/Mathlib (no sorry; axiom oracle: Lean's threestandard axioms), and an independent high-precision numerical audit ofevery inequality used is reported.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv1Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.