Two-Query Chirality in Tetrahedral Quantum Echoes: Exact Parallel Readout, a Nine-Dimensional Query Defect, and a Certified Adaptive Advantage
Four balanced Pauli kicks along the vertices of a regular tetrahedron, followed by their reverse echo, generate 24 order-labelled qubit unitary channels. The words share a trace and form two 12-element orbits of the proper tetrahedral group. One query sees only their common trace. At two queries, orbit-dependent quadratic energies yield closed formulas for the Bell-square and globally optimized parallel strategies. At the algebraic point q=1/2, every causally ordered two-query protocol has success at most 9/24 because the fixed trace removes one dimension from the universal quadratic query space. An explicit rational two-comb normalization, a six-Kraus realization, and an exact weighted-frame identity attain the cap, giving P_causal=3/8 and P_parallel=(5+sqrt(15))/24. A uniform Lipschitz estimate proves that the same causal tester remains strictly better on an explicit open pulse interval. The result is an analytic adaptive advantage for a concrete non-group ensemble. It does not address indefinite causal order, noise, finite statistics, or arbitrary qubit ensembles. The central causal certificate is replayed exactly in quotient-ring arithmetic; the supplied word/collision and representation scripts are mixed symbolic-numerical corroborating audits.
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Not assessed
- Reproducibility
- Partial
- Lean 4
- Not applicable
Recorded under ARR-VERIFY-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.
Version history
The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
- v1 · source snapshot available · viewing
AI assistance statement
OpenAI Codex assisted with symbolic exploration, literature triage, proof stress testing, code drafting, manuscript editing, release preparation, machine-readable extraction, and ARR deposit checks. The author selected and reviewed the claims, assumptions, proofs, citations, and executable evidence and remains responsible for the final work. AI output is not treated as independent scientific evidence.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Independent model assessments
No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Founder-owned pilot record: Lluis Eriksson is both the author and ARR's current founder-editor. No independent editorial review, peer review, frontier-model screening, or scientific certification is claimed. Acceptance records a technically valid deposit, not a finding that the paper is correct.