Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-2VT5B14BC88EG9TD · v1 · 2026-01-12

Operational Signatures of Criticality from Petz Recovery: Collar-length Requirements in TFIM Exact Diagonalization

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We study whether recovery-based operational distances exhibit a distinctive finite-size signature near quantum criticality. For a tripartition A-B-C of a 1D chain with a collar B of width w separating A from C, we compute a Petz-based reconstructed state and the recovery error E_Petz(w) = -log F (squared Uhlmann fidelity), and define an effective recovery distance d_eff(epsilon) as the minimal collar width achieving error below epsilon, stabilized by E_best(w) = min over w' <= w of E_Petz(w') and reported with explicit censoring. Using exact diagonalization of the transverse-field Ising chain at N = 11 with |A| = 2, we sweep hx across the critical region at hz = 0 and compare to a longitudinally perturbed control hz = 0.5: pronounced growth and extensive censoring of d_eff(epsilon) appear in the critical region at low temperature, while the control remains comparatively featureless; an extended-collar spot-check yields d_eff(1e-3) of about 7.6-7.7 at beta = 12 near hx in {0.96, 1.00}. v2 adds (no v1 result is changed): an explicit |C|-shrinkage caveat -- at fixed N, growing w also shrinks C, so the absolute scale of d_eff near w_max conflates buffer growth with a shrinking reconstruction target, while fixed-geometry comparisons across hx (the criticality signature) are unaffected; a window-relativity remark (epsilon, beta, N jointly set what is resolvable: at smaller N the beta = 12, epsilon = 1e-3 window censors even off-critical points, consistent with v1's own zoom); delivery of v1's "future work" item: a CMI-based distance computed on the same sweep shows the same criticality signature at its own threshold (CMI decays about half as fast as the Petz error, cf. 2601.0035); series positioning; and a fully regenerable verification suite.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.