The Conditional Maintenance Work Theorem: Operational Power Lower Bounds from Energy Pinching and a Split-Inclusion Blueprint for Type III AQFT
Earlier deposit preserved without the current AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record
We derive operational lower bounds on the minimal thermodynamic power required to maintain quantum coherence against uncontrolled open-system dynamics. Work is defined as the consumption of non-equilibrium free energy stored in an explicit battery at bath temperature T, namely W := F_W(sigma_W) - F_W(sigma'_W) with F_W(sigma) = k_B T S(sigma||gamma_W), and allowed controls are battery-assisted thermal operations implemented by energy-conserving global unitaries. Coherence is quantified as a relative entropy to a conditional expectation, C_E(rho) := S(rho||E[rho]). Our main proved results are: (i) an unconditional maintenance bound P_min(rho) >= k_B T sigma(rho), where sigma(rho) >= 0 is the entropy production rate of the target under the uncontrolled semigroup (Spohn), which splits via the pinching Pythagorean identity as sigma = F_diag + C_loss; (ii) the coherence-power bound P_min >= k_B T C_loss(rho) under a diagonal-contraction hypothesis satisfied by Davies generators; and (iii) extra-power bounds for coherence stabilization relative to thermodynamically efficient population-maintenance baselines — version 1's "assumption-free" paired-infimum formulation is shown to be vacuous (the unlinked-pairs infimum is minus infinity), and the corrected statement is genuinely assumption-free precisely when the pinched target is stationary (e.g. pure dephasing), where the baseline is free. We further provide a conditional extension to general conditional expectations and a Type III split blueprint, with external geometric inputs encoded as explicit two-sided interface assumptions. All finite-dimensional claims are verified by an exact numerical suite distributed with the paper. These results provide an operational resource criterion for quantum-to-classical behavior, not a collapse theory.Version 2 corrects a sign error in the work definition and in the final step of v1's Appendix A, replaces v1's vacuous extra-power definition, and strengthens the main bound to an unconditional entropy-production form.
Preview PDF on this page v1
Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.
Cite this paper
Lluis Eriksson (2025). The Conditional Maintenance Work Theorem: Operational Power Lower Bounds from Energy Pinching and a Split-Inclusion Blueprint for Type III AQFT. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2025-76C3S3SSMP8HJ8NF, v1. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2025-76C3S3SSMP8HJ8NF/versions/v1/ Archived manuscript; ARR-2025-76C3S3SSMP8HJ8NF v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.
Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.
Version history
The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
- v1 · source snapshot available · viewing
Original ai.vixra version history
Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; AIRR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Not assessed
- Reproducibility
- Not assessed
- Lean 4
- Not assessed
Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.
AI assistance statement
Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. AIRR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Model assessments and review context
No supported exact-version report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Author-authorized historical import. AIRR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.