Refix-Path Bell Transport on Ibm Quantum Hardware: High-Resolution Replication, Comparative Geometry Dependence, and Stress Tests of a Static—Dynamic Link
Earlier deposit preserved without the current AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record
This note reports a replicated, high-resolution Bell-transport experiment on IBM Quantum superconducting hardware using a prefix-path protocol that controls spatial heterogeneity across transport lengths. A single physical qubit chain is fixed and increasing transport length L is realized via prefixes of that chain, so that L changes depth while keeping qubits nested rather than switching to different qubit subsets. We reconstruct the Bell-state fidelity F(L) from Pauli correlators E_XX, E_YY, E_ZZ and apply a minimal drift correction using interleaved full-Phi+ control blocks. Beyond a single-chain sweep, we perform a comparative geometry test across three disjoint physical chains on the same backend: the effective decay scale differs significantly across chains (with >10 sigma separations under fit uncertainties), providing operational evidence that the transport decay scale is geometry-dependent under fixed compilation constraints. Motivated by the Rate Inheritance Principle (RIP) framing, we also investigate whether a phase-sensitive static correlation metric measured on idle chains can predict dynamical transport decay. A curated three-chain set exhibits an ordering agreement between a static Ramsey-X nearest-neighbor covariance metric and the transport decay scales mu measured on the same chains; however, scale-up studies over n=18 randomly sampled chains and a preregistered out-of-sample prediction test do not show statistically significant monotone association under permutation testing. We interpret the static—dynamic ordering agreement as conditional and geometry-specific, while the geometry dependence of dynamical decay is robust. v2 adds: a fitting-choice caveat with a synthetically validated re-analysis pipeline for future variant tables, a power bound showing the negative preregistered test excludes a strong device-wide static—dynamic law (from published quantities alone), an all-lengths rate proxy specification, small-sample and estimator caveats, context references, and an offline re-analysis script with documented schema for a future data revision.
Preview PDF on this page v1
Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.
Cite this paper
Lluis Eriksson (2025). Refix-Path Bell Transport on Ibm Quantum Hardware: High-Resolution Replication, Comparative Geometry Dependence, and Stress Tests of a Static—Dynamic Link. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2025-42P63ZKJP39JK98S, v1. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2025-42P63ZKJP39JK98S/versions/v1/ Archived manuscript; ARR-2025-42P63ZKJP39JK98S v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.
Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.
Version history
The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
- v1 · source snapshot available · viewing
Original ai.vixra version history
Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; AIRR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Not assessed
- Reproducibility
- Not assessed
- Lean 4
- Not assessed
Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.
AI assistance statement
Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. AIRR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Model assessments and review context
No supported exact-version report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Author-authorized historical import. AIRR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.