Operational Coherence Maintenance and the Quantum-Classical Boundary: Formal Definitions, Falsifiable Protocols, and an Outlook for Cognitive Systems
Earlier deposit preserved without the current AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record
Maintaining quantum coherence against uncontrolled open-system dynamics is a control task with unavoidable thermodynamic cost. In a finite-dimensional setting with battery-assisted thermal operations at bath temperature T, we present the corrected operational hierarchy for maintenance power: an unconditional lower bound P_min(rho) >= k_B T sigma(rho) with sigma(rho) the entropy production rate of the target (proved in the appendix); the coherence-power bound P_min >= k_B T Cdot_loss(rho) under diagonal contraction; and incremental (extra) power bounds relative to thermodynamically efficient population-maintenance baselines, which become assumption-free exactly when the pinched target is stationary -- e.g. under pure dephasing, the very dissipator used in this paper's numerical protocol. Here C(rho) = S(rho||Delta[rho]) is relative-entropy coherence to energy pinching and Cdot_loss(rho) := -d/dt C(rho_t)|_{t=0}. These statements are operational, observer-independent, and geometry-free. We then present the Rate Inheritance Principle (RIP) as the falsifiable dynamical bridge between static clustering and decoherence rates, with its status: weak form a lemma under explicit hypotheses; strong form derived, with a frequency-resolved squared-amplitude exponent, in an exactly solvable quasi-free local-sink class; failure through near-zero Bohr-frequency channels realized within the secular Davies class. We provide falsifiable protocols distinguishing one-shot work from sustained maintenance power, including a numerical stress test (distance-independent influence floor without an interface vs collar-induced suppression) in a transverse-field Ising chain with remote dephasing. Finally, an explicitly speculative Outlook connects the resource boundary to the Free-Energy Principle for resource-limited agents, at a methodological (non-phenomenological) level.
Preview PDF on this page v1
Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.
Cite this paper
Lluis Eriksson (2025). Operational Coherence Maintenance and the Quantum-Classical Boundary: Formal Definitions, Falsifiable Protocols, and an Outlook for Cognitive Systems. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2025-199995HEM58RZAPN, v1. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2025-199995HEM58RZAPN/versions/v1/ Archived manuscript; ARR-2025-199995HEM58RZAPN v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.
Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.
Version history
The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
- v1 · source snapshot available · viewing
Original ai.vixra version history
Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; AIRR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Not assessed
- Reproducibility
- Not assessed
- Lean 4
- Not assessed
Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.
AI assistance statement
Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. AIRR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Model assessments and review context
No supported exact-version report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Author-authorized historical import. AIRR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.