Research paperHistorical importARR-2025-13JDAZFXPP81EBY4 · v1 · 2025-12-19

Operational Coherence Maintenance: Proven Results, Conditional Interfaces, and Open Dynamical Gaps

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

Maintaining quantum coherence against uncontrolled open-system dynamics is an operational control task with unavoidable thermodynamic cost. In finite dimensions, explicit lower bounds on the minimal power required to stabilize coherence can be derived under standard Markovian assumptions, independently of geometric or field-theoretic structure. At the same time, static correlations in gapped systems are geometrically suppressed, raising the question of how such suppression influences dynamical decoherence rates and, consequently, coherence-maintenance power. Bridging the two domains requires dynamical input that static clustering alone does not provide.This note introduces no new technical results. It provides a logical closure of the program by separating (i) results proven without additional structure, (ii) conditional interfaces, and (iii) dynamical hypotheses — and, new in this version, it updates the status of the central hinge. In v1, rate inheritance — the relation between static correlation envelopes and effective decoherence rates — was identified as the unique unresolved hinge. Since then it has been partially resolved in both directions anticipated by v1's scenario analysis: it is now a derived, frequency-resolved law in an exactly solvable quasi-free local-sink class (2512.0064 v2), and the failure scenario through near-zero-frequency channels has been realized within the Davies model class, with the persistent floor computed and the secular nonlocality of that construction quantified (2512.0070 v2). The imported maintenance bound is restated in its corrected v2 form (2512.0061 v2), whose v1 formulation was vacuous. The framework's design goal — robustness under partial refutation — has thus been exercised in practice, twice.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.