RIP-U and the ω = 0 Obstruction in Davies Dynamics: Upper Envelopes, Witness Floors, and Falsification Protocols for Separation-Dependent Decoherence Rates
Earlier deposit preserved without the current AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record
We isolate the dynamic hinge in typed separation-to-rate-to-power pipelines within the Davies (weak-coupling, Markovian) setting in finite dimension. First, we formulate an upper-envelope statement (RIP-U): under an explicit factorized bath-correlation envelope with separation-dependent amplitude f(epsilon) and integrable time profile, Fourier-transformed Davies rates inherit an O(f(epsilon)) envelope. Under additional regularity assumptions preventing trivial degeneracies, this yields a worst-case bound kappa_up(epsilon) <= C f(epsilon) for the instantaneous relative loss rate of a coherence-like functional. Second, we isolate a structural obstruction to lower-envelope statements: we prove an exact identity for the omega = 0 contribution to the Davies Dirichlet form, E^(0)sigma(O) = (gamma(0)/2) ||[S(0),O]||^2{2,sigma}, and derive a witness mechanism showing how omega = 0 channels can enforce a non-vanishing dissipation contribution for suitable observable families. We emphasize directionality: RIP-U (upper) does not imply a positive lower envelope kappa_down(epsilon) without additional family-qualified input. All assumptions are explicit and accompanied by falsification routes. v2 (no v1 number is changed): two v1 assumptions are upgraded to proved statements in their canonical instances -- Delta-MONO holds unconditionally for the energy pinching (Davies covariance plus data processing), and a sufficient bridge with an explicit constant is proved; the cross-reference labels are repaired (in v1 every assumption and theorem was typeset as "Definition x.y"); Table 1 is re-typeset (overlapping text in v1); the omega = 0 identity is placed within the corrected Bohr-channel decomposition of the companion 2601.0023 (it is exactly the omega = 0 sector, and the plain-commutator form provably fails at omega != 0); and a verification suite reproduces every proved item numerically, including the identity at machine precision and an explicit family with kappa_down much smaller than kappa_up under the same envelope.
Preview PDF on this page v1
Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.
Cite this paper
Lluis Eriksson (2026). RIP-U and the ω = 0 Obstruction in Davies Dynamics: Upper Envelopes, Witness Floors, and Falsification Protocols for Separation-Dependent Decoherence Rates. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2026-53WA9C4RB39JRRXF, v1. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2026-53WA9C4RB39JRRXF/versions/v1/ Archived manuscript; ARR-2026-53WA9C4RB39JRRXF v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.
Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.
Version history
The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
- v1 · source snapshot available · viewing
Original ai.vixra version history
Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; AIRR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Not assessed
- Reproducibility
- Not assessed
- Lean 4
- Not assessed
Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.
AI assistance statement
Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. AIRR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Model assessments and review context
No supported exact-version report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Author-authorized historical import. AIRR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.