Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-4GJP1XS78A95XS6H · v1 · 2026-07-12

Exact Stabilization by Additive GKLS Control Is Impossible at a Leaky Boundary

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

The tangent cone of quantum state space at a rank-deficient density matrix is known to have a positive exterior block, and recent work identifies all of its directions with Lindbladian velocities. We derive a quantitative stabilization consequence of this geometry. Let rho be a finite-dimensional target with support projector P, set Q = 1 - P, and let an uncontrolled GKLS generator L have outward support-leakage rate a = Tr[Q L(rho)] > 0. Every additive GKLS controller, including a bounded time-dependent controller, has its own nonnegative outward rate at rho and therefore cannot cancel a. Consequently, no finite-rate additive Markovian controller can keep the system exactly at the target. The conclusion persists for arbitrary finite-dimensional autonomous ancillas, provided the adverse system generator remains additive and local to the system.Under induced trace-norm bounds ||L|| <= M and ||K_t|| <= Gamma, we prove the dynamic corridor inequality limsup ||rho_t - rho||_1 >= 2a/(M + Gamma), without assuming convergence to a stationary state. An autonomous Poisson-reset generator supplies a matching inverse-rate upper bound, establishing the order-optimal minimax law Theta(Gamma^{-1}).For a soft-filter dual-rail SSH family, the microscopic leakage coefficient scales as exp[-(2m + q)ell + o(ell)], whereas the ideal logical disturbance scales as exp[-4m ell + O(1)]. We derive the exact controller-growth threshold g_min = max{0, 2m - q}. Thus, below the filter threshold q = 2m, retaining ideal logical accuracy requires an exponentially growing autonomous correction intensity.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv1Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.