Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-3Q0VH7PMNV8C9VQE · v1 · 2026-07-14

The Volume-Uniform Poincaré Walls: Machine-Checked Obstructions for Flat and Fluctuation-Sector Block-Poincaré Routes to Combes—Thomas Coercivity in Lattice Yang—Mills

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

Inside a Lean 4 formalization programme for four-dimensional SU(Nc) lattice Yang—Mills, we report two machine-checked negative results and the machine-checked infrastructure that makes them meaningful. The positive substrate is: (i) a fixed-volume Combes—Thomas chain for self-adjoint coercive finite-range lattice operators, instantiated on the flat gauge-fixed covariance of the physical shell, with coercivity constant c = min(1,a)/C_P fed by a proved fixed-volume flat Hodge/block-Poincaré inequality; and (ii) the concrete adjoint model of SU(n) — su(n) with the trace inner product, dim_R su(n) = n² − 1, and the isometric transport to Euclidean coordinates — so that the abstract adjoint-model interface has a concrete nontrivial inhabitant and the flat-lane results can be instantiated with the genuine matricial adjoint model. The first wall states that, under the block normalization actually used by the formalized chain, every flat Hodge/block-Poincaré constant obeys L^d/L² ≤ C_P on the fine torus of side LNu2032, hence the volume-uniform Poincaré gate is provably false for d ≥ 3 and Nc ≥ 2, and no positive coercivity constant survives all volumes through this route. The route consumed by the fixed-volume endpoint is therefore closed by theorem. A second wall stands in the fluctuation sector. For d ≥ 3 and a transported half-period square-wave mode on the exact fine side (2M)Nu2032, the formalization proves ||QA||² ≤ (2M)u207b¹||A||², the exact identity = 8((2M)Nu2032)u207b¹||A||², and therefore a Rayleigh numerator at most 9(2M)u207b¹||A||². Every quotient Poincaré constant is thus at least 2M/9, so the volume-uniform fluctuation-sector gate is also provably false for every positive Nu2032, d ≥ 3, Nc ≥ 2, and every adjoint model. Everything stated here is checked by Lean 4 against a pinned Mathlib, with zero sorry, zero project axioms, and a committed axiom-oracle transcript. A dependency record, theorem-artifact map, and reproduction instructions expose the complete proof chain. Both walls concern the current unscaled line-integral block map with the current unweighted coarse norm; neither gate is claimed to be necessary, equivalent, or exhaustive for Yang—Mills theory. No claim toward a continuum construction or a mass-gap theorem is made.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv1Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.