THE MASTER MAP - Audit Experiments Report: Mechanical Audit Experiments and Reproducibility Appendix for the 2602-Series Programme on 4D SU(N) Yang-Mills
Earlier deposit preserved without the current AIRR screening. Not peer reviewed. Screening record
This is the experiment-first audit report for the 2602-series programme: a runnable mechanical suite (repository ym-audit) with declared pass/fail criteria, a 2D Yang-Mills benchmark, gauge/infrastructure/UV-flow proxy layers, and a reproducibility manifest. Version 3 aligns the report with the fully audited programme and corrects three defects in the harness itself. Scope statement (sharpened): the 29 tests adjudicate exact identities, toy models, and group-theoretic facts; they cross-validate the per-paper suites of THE-ERIKSSON-PROGRAMME (verification/2602-*, 15 papers, independent implementations agreeing where they overlap, e.g. the triangular-lock dimension counts); they do NOT discharge any entry of the programme ledger - a 29/29 run leaves the hypothesis set {(H1), (H2)+beta_LF, (H3), (H2'), (H-LOC), L6.2-import, (H-Rbeta), (H-P0'), structural+window, lambda != 0 traceable, ...} exactly as it was. Corrections: the d=4 harmonic coefficient is 1/2 (harness had 3/2, a dropped-term bug; the paper chain had 3/5, the d=3 value - three-way inconsistency now settled and machine-adjudicated); the non-triviality test is rescoped (Haar kurtosis != 3 is a single-link fact - exactly 2 for SU(2) - present even at strong coupling; what it verifies is C4(N) > 0); the super-polynomial large-field test is restated under the audited log-power profile. The 2D YM benchmark (transfer-matrix gap Delta = g^2 N/2 to 1e-14) and the dependency DAG survive; "Papers 86-90" are pinned to 2602.0088 v3 / 0087 v3 / 0092 v2 / 0091 v2 / 0096 v2.
Preview PDF on this page v1
Uses your browser's PDF viewer. Open the PDF directly if a preview is unavailable.
Cite this paper
Lluis Eriksson (2026). THE MASTER MAP - Audit Experiments Report: Mechanical Audit Experiments and Reproducibility Appendix for the 2602-Series Programme on 4D SU(N) Yang-Mills. AIRR.SCIENCE, ARR-2026-07WK42E0ZR9H8AXE, v1. https://airr.science/papers/ARR-2026-07WK42E0ZR9H8AXE/versions/v1/ Archived manuscript; ARR-2026-07WK42E0ZR9H8AXE v1. Not peer reviewed by AIRR. Historical import; not assessed by AIRR.
Use this version link to cite the manuscript you read. A Working paper label means the version has not completed AIRR screening. AIRR screening is not journal peer review. Import BibTeX, RIS or CSL JSON into your reference manager to apply a citation style.
Version history
The paper identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.
- v1 · source snapshot available · viewing
Original ai.vixra version history
Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; AIRR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.
Verification record
- Frontier-model screening
- Not assessed
- Source integrity
- Pass
- Bibliographic integrity
- Not assessed
- Reproducibility
- Not assessed
- Lean 4
- Not assessed
Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. AIRR verification and screening are not peer review.
AI assistance statement
Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. AIRR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.
Frontier-model screening
Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.
Model assessments and review context
No supported exact-version report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.
No model reports are published for this version.
A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. AIRR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.
Editorial disclosure
Author-authorized historical import. AIRR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.