Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-3FHSR0Q6W49X38F6 · v1 · 2026-08-04

Endpoint Parity Loss in a Bessel Wronskian: an Exact Obstruction to Kernel-and-Anchor Proofs of Global Ratio Monotonicity

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

For beta > 0 let I_m = I_m(beta) denote the modified Bessel functionof the first kind and define a_m = I_m^2 ((m-1) I_(m-1)^2 + (m+1) I_(m+1)^2), b_m = m I_m^4,with sine series F_A(t) = sum_(m>=1) a_m sin(mt) andF_B(t) = sum_(m>=1) b_m sin(mt). The associated Wronskian is negativeexactly when F_A/F_B is decreasing. We isolate what can and cannot beproved from two natural inputs: the Neumann convolution kernelI_0(2 beta sin(phi/2)) and the small-coupling anchor whose normalizedlimit is 4 sin^3(t).First, the convolution does prove F_B(t) > 0 for 0 < t < pi. Second,the endpoint is governed by two alternating quantities, c_3 and B_pi,through an exact cubic law. We prove B_pi > 0, derive integralrepresentations, and establish that the cancellation lost by replacingthe alternating quantities with positive-term majorants has exponentialrate 8 - 4 sqrt(2). Finally, we prove a smooth one-parameter perturbationtheorem: one may keep F_B and its kernel unchanged, preserve positivityand strict coefficient-ratio ordering, and preserve every jet at beta = 0,while choosing either sign of the endpoint cubic coefficient.Consequently those structural data, even taken together, do not implyglobal Wronskian negativity. This is a no-go theorem for a proofarchitecture, not a counterexample to the original Bessel conjecture.A short high-precision kill-test accompanies the paper; nocomputer-assisted inequality is used in the proofs.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv1Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.