Research paperHistorical importARR-2026-0S1R9TEN1580VT82 · v1 · 2026-02-12

DLR-Uniform Log-Sobolev Inequality and Mass Gap for Lattice Yang—Mills at Weak Coupling: a Conditional and Windowed Reduction

Lluis Eriksson

Abstract

We study the passage from the uniform log-Sobolev inequality (LSI) on periodic tori, developed in the companion series, to a DLR-uniform LSI for the conditional Gibbs specification of SU(N_c) lattice Yang-Mills in d >= 3 at weak coupling (beta >= beta_0), and from there to a mass gap via Stroock-Zegarlinski and Osterwalder-Seiler reflection positivity. Version 2 corrects the logical status of the main results after a quantitative audit (companion numerical suite included; Appendix A). (i) The fiber assembly (Lemma 3.5) assumes the block Dobrushin condition delta < 1, which v1's own Remark 3.6 left unverified; the printed influence bound c_ij <= tanh(beta n_bd/2) tends to 1 as beta -> infinity and yields delta < 1 only for beta <~ 10^(-2) (d=3) or beta <~ 10^(-3) (d=4) — the opposite of the weak-coupling regime. A rotor exhibit shows the genuine worst-case block influence also tends to 1, so no worst-case criterion can close the gap: the condition is now the explicit hypothesis (H-DOB-blk), and v1's claim of removing the Dobrushin-type Assumption 6.3 of [14] is withdrawn — the present paper reduces that assumption to (H-DOB-blk). (ii) The quantitative absorption in Proposition 4.3 inherits hypothesis (H-P0) of ai.viXra:2602.0052(v2): under the polylog penalty floor p0(g) >= c_0 |log g|^(1+epsilon_0) the required inequality e^(-c p0(g_k)) <= C L_RG^(-(d-1)k) fails already at k = O(1). (iii) The proof assumes g_k <= gamma_0 for all k <= n_max ~ log_LRG diam(Lambda'); with the corrected asymptotic-freedom flow of the series erratum this holds only on the volume window log_LRG diam(Lambda') <= k*(beta), i.e. diam(Lambda') <= e^(C/g^2+O(1)). Theorems 1.1-1.2 are therefore restated as windowed and conditional on (H-DOB-blk) and (H-P0). What survives unconditionally — and is validated numerically — is the boundary-uniformity mechanism itself: the per-plaquette oscillation and gradient bounds (Lemma 3.1; sharp for N_c=2), the "frozen = slow" reduction (Lemma 3.2), the refined dynamical large-field event, the energy-penalty identity ||U-1||_HS^2 = 2N_c(1 - Re tr U / N_c), the TV <= tanh(osc/4) lemma with its two-point equality case, and the Bakry-Emery constant N_c/4 in the = -2 tr(XY) convention. The contribution of the paper is thus retagged: a boundary-uniform reduction of the DLR-LSI and the mass gap to (H-DOB-blk)+(H-P0) within the volume window — not an unconditional mass gap.

Original depositai.vixra first-submission history · source omits timezone
Historical mirrorv2Author-authorized ARR bulk release · SHA-256 recorded
Mirrored PDF downloadsNot measuredBulk historical-release assets are not yet included in ARR's per-record download snapshot.
Page viewsNot measuredPage views are not measured until ARR connects a privacy-reviewed, no-cookie analytics source.
Definitions and rankings →
Not yet rated

Verification record

Frontier-model screening
Not assessed
Source integrity
Pass
Bibliographic integrity
Not assessed
Reproducibility
Not assessed
Lean 4
Not assessed

Recorded under ARR-HISTORICAL-IMPORT-1.0. ARR verification and screening are not peer review.

Version history

The ARR identifier remains stable. Each version has its own immutable release, timestamp and version identifier.

  • v1 · source snapshot available · viewing

Original ai.vixra version history

Dates below are the source submission timestamps. ai.vixra omits a timezone; ARR preserves the displayed values and uses the normalized offset only for deterministic ordering.

  • v2 · original ai.vixra file
  • v1 · original ai.vixra file

AI assistance statement

Historical import from ai.vixra, an AI-assisted e-print archive. ARR has not normalized or independently verified the original manuscript's model-use disclosure; the author remains responsible for its contents.

Frontier-model screening

Status: not_assessed. Any listed reports correspond to this exact version under ARR-SCREEN-1.0; no absent assessment is represented as a pass.

    Longitudinal frontier-model record

    Independent model assessments

    Read the scale and limits
    Not yet rated

    No eligible independent ARR-ASSESS-1.0 report is published for this exact version. Missing evidence is not scored as zero.

    No model reports are published for this version.

    A model assessment is not peer review or a correctness certificate. ARR preserves disagreement, exact-version provenance and later reassessments.

    Editorial disclosure

    Author-authorized historical import. ARR verified file retrieval and integrity only; it did not perform the current hostile frontier-model admission audit, peer review, novelty review, or correctness certification.